| paper index | HOME |
We aim to investigate the e.ect of representation style on the process of requirements analysis. We performed a comparative experiment using two representations style: UML based style and dictionary style. We analyzed requirements documents using de.ned metrics. As a result, dictionary style seemed to be adequate for the comprehensive description and UML style seemed to be adequate for the as-is reuse of the domain knowledge. The remaining problem is to show the dependency of the e.ectiveness on the target domain.
@Article(,
Title="{ドメイン知識表現が要求獲得に与える影響の分析}",
Author="長田 晃 and 小澤 大伍 and 海谷 治彦 and 海尻 賢二",
Journal="情報処理学会研究会報告",
Year="2006",
Volume="2006",
Number="35",
Pages="57-64",
Month="Mar.",
Note="ソフトウェア工学 2006-SE-151 (8)"
)