| paper index | HOME | 
We aim to investigate the e.ect of representation style on the process of requirements analysis. We performed a comparative experiment using two representations style: UML based style and dictionary style. We analyzed requirements documents using de.ned metrics. As a result, dictionary style seemed to be adequate for the comprehensive description and UML style seemed to be adequate for the as-is reuse of the domain knowledge. The remaining problem is to show the dependency of the e.ectiveness on the target domain.
@Article(,
    Title="{ドメイン知識表現が要求獲得に与える影響の分析}",
    Author="長田 晃 and 小澤 大伍 and 海谷 治彦 and 海尻 賢二",
    Journal="情報処理学会研究会報告",
    Year="2006",
    Volume="2006",
    Number="35",
    Pages="57-64",
    Month="Mar.",
    Note="ソフトウェア工学 2006-SE-151 (8)"
)